Subject:
|
Re: legOS and alternate operating systems [now off topic]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 20:25:07 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Laurentino Martins <LMARTINS@MARKTEST.saynotospamPT>
|
Viewed:
|
3708 times
|
| |
|
|
At 20:12 30-12-1998 Wednesday , you wrote:
> Norman Fair wrote:
>
> > I don't know what language was used, but I'd guess it was object oriented.
> > Unlike older languages that only compile the routines that are actually
> > used, object oriented compiles everything. That's why a program written in
> > C++ is up to 100 times as large as the same C version.
>
> The implication of this statement is that 99% of a traditional C
> programme was unused and discarded by the compiler. If so, there's
> something mighty unusual about your coding style :-).
>
> My own suspicion is that in fact "object oriented design" as now
> promulgated (and as distinct from old-school OO) is actually an
> anti-methodology: it legitimates various kinds of ad hoc hacking - like
> massive cut-and-paste "code reuse" (true code reuse having to do with
> abstraction, not replication) - that are traditionally frowned upon by
> academics but pandemic in industry.
>
> ...So along comes OO saying that everything you always did in industry
> and got sneered at for is now ok - and you get an instant win on PR
> (which is usually where languages win or die, sadly).
>
> It's also the case that nowadays *everyone* tries to use C++ while in
> the old days C was something you "graduated" to after you already had a
> full set of clues. And C++ is about five times more complex than C.
>
> Oh, and of course even I've been known to go, great, I can now BUY a gig
> of RAM - let's use a BIG table....
>
> Ach, but I'm cynical in my old age.
Don't force us mailing list subscribers to read your almost philosophical discussions about programming languages that have nothing to do with LEGO Robotics. You are waaaay out of topic!
Thank you
Laurentino Martins *<||:-)
[mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt]
[http://www.terravista.pt/Enseada/2808/]
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: legOS and alternate operating systems
|
| I don't know what language was used, but I'd guess it was object oriented. Unlike older languages that only compile the routines that are actually used, object oriented compiles everything. That's why a program written in C++ is up to 100 times as (...) (28 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
