Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:25:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
732 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Rob Doucette writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > Is there interest in creation of such a group?
> >
> > -Suz
> >
> > Suzanne Rich
> > LUGNET Admin
>
> Yes, although I think the question is "is there an interest in *not* having
> Spybotics discussions in the main .robotics or .general groups?"
>
> -Rob.
Following form, it belongs alongside RCX, under .robotics.
My fear actually was that a group's creation isn't warranted - that we create
it for something thats attention is short-lived. But with what I just read Dave
is up to, it seems worthwhile..
Can you tell me if the "MindStorms" identity is on the box?
-Suz
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics?
|
| In lugnet.robotics, Suzanne D. Rich writes: <snip> (...) I dunno if this is official enough for you, but they have the Spybotics listed under Mindstorms on the S@H page. I'm at work now so the box my Gigamesh came in is nowhere near me, and I threw (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics?
|
| (...) From the box picture on LEGO's site does not have Mindstorms on it in any noticable way. It is a LEGO logo with Spybotics in big letters. Jude (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics?
|
| (...) Yes, although I think the question is "is there an interest in *not* having Spybotics discussions in the main .robotics or .general groups?" -Rob. (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
