Subject:
|
RE: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 13:37:05 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Rob Limbaugh <rlimbaugh@greenfieldgroup.com%Spamcake%>
|
Viewed:
|
421 times
|
| |
|
|
Aren't rechargeable alkaline supposed to be better than NiMH?
Don't NiMH batteries lose their charge just "sitting around" if not placed in a
trickle charger?
> > Does anyone have any comments about using rechargeable • batteries in the
> > RCX? Has anyone had any bad experiences with this? Can • anyone recommend
> > whether NiMH is better or worse than NiCd? Thanks.
>
> Definitely use NiMH's.
>
> NiCd's are a problem - they only generate 1.2 volts instead
> of the usual
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rechargeable batteries and the RCX
|
| In article (...) Depends. Rechargeable alkaline have a higher nominal voltage, but also higher internal resistance than NiMH. Under light load the alkalines will provide a higher voltage for a longer period of time. Under heavy load, they provide (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
