Subject:
|
Re: Lego patents
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:09:49 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <{sjbaker1@airmail}AntiSpam{.net}>
|
Reply-To:
|
sjbaker1@airmail.net*saynotospam*
|
Viewed:
|
1336 times
|
| |
|
|
John Kozma wrote:
> I have looked for patents that expressly include the term Lego on the USPTO
> website. Most involve references to stackable or interlocking elements, and
> cite Lego as an example of the concept. Quite a few are for Legos or
> similar toys. I haven't found any yet that actually involve using Legos to
> reduce an invention to practice. Two questions:
The basic lego brick patent has expired (hence MegaBloks and other low grade
wannabe's).
Dunno about your other questions though.
----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
http://toobular.sf.net http://lodestone.sf.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Lego patents
|
| I will be teaching a course on Information Technology Law in the Computer Science Department at the College of Charleston next semester. Having recently purchased (mainly for my own entertainment) a Lego Mindstorms Robotics Invention kit, it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
