 | | RE: All-around-the-robot bump detection —
|
| | | Jeremy makes a very good point ! :) You should be able to get away with 3 (in theory). I think this "bladder" idea might work better as you could have more air displaced (assuming you hit the obstacle with any kind of speed <G> ). me Andrew Phelps (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: All-around-the-robot bump detection —Linc Smith
|
| | | | lego-robotics@crynwr.com wrote in message I think this "bladder" idea might work better as you could have more air displaced (assuming you hit the obstacle with any kind of speed <G> ). Concern for a bump producing enough displacement to move the (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
