Subject:
|
Re: Boosting the IR Signal Info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:51:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
525 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi John,
of course you're right. (I really didn't think about it that far !)
This might (will ?!?) result in a feedback-loop (like holding a microphone
in front of the speaker the microphone works for)
The only way to avoid this will be to optically seperate the two channels.
[ooh ooh, Lego purists will hate me ;-) ] That will only work if you remove
the covers from RCX and tower (or replace it with an seperation) and
optically seperate IR-diode and IR-photo-transistor.
Best regards
Rainer
P.S.: Good to know there are people out there thinking about what we write !
In lugnet.robotics, John Barnes writes:
> I have been watching this thread with great interest, having
> struggled almightily to solve the problem myself.
>
> I would like an explanation of how a one directional "extender"
> of one sort or another (IR or RF) is going to work with the
> RCX which requires two way communications.
>
> I suspect the average booster, if used in pairs, nose to tail
> so to speak, would simply feed back on its own signal and
> not correctly handle two way communications.
>
> I await enlightenment .... (excuse the pun ;)
>
> JB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Boosting the IR Signal Info
|
| I have been watching this thread with great interest, having struggled almightily to solve the problem myself. I would like an explanation of how a one directional "extender" of one sort or another (IR or RF) is going to work with the RCX which (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
