 | | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) Assuming the robot is being used self-powered (versus with AC adapter), would there be benefit in modifying the RCX to run off a single 9 volt versus all those AA's? That would save quite a bit of weight. :) Doing this wouldn't be "Lego pure" (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) This would cause the weight to go down for acceleration, but then when you turned off the motors, you would coast a shorter distance due to your less inertia. It would depend if you were building a robot for pure acceleration, or not. It would (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More juice out of the standard motors.
|
|
(...) In general terms, worm gears are less efficient than standard gears as they have more inherent friction - essentially, driving a worm gear is like pushing something up an inclined slope. How much this translates into a lego system I have no (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego R/C etc
|
|
erm... for LEGO purists, there's LEGO #8483 Technic CyberMaster ;) (a pBrick with RF PC control that provides a perfect Lego roverbot chassis) Check (URL) -----Original Message----- (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: W2K
|
|
I don't know of anybody who has successfully implemented the mindstorms sw on W2K, I worked at it for a while. I think RCXX Command Center works ok with W2K but can't be absolutely sure about that. phil -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
