 | | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
(...) How do you compensate in software? Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
"Dean Husby" <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> wrote in message news:3A6E7170.F38BA6...a.bc.ca... (...) accurate sensors would (...) compensate for the inaccuracy (...) disappointed or not to use them. (...) Exactly... you can't. Unless you use another sensor, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
I guess I didn't word that very well. I didn't mean that you can make an inaccurate sensor look like an accurate sensor via software. What I meant is that you write your software to know that the sensor is not accurate, i.e. the software doesn't act (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
What kinds of sprocket(s) does Lego currently use with tracks? A long time ago (in decades), I remember a set that used Caterpillar-link-style tracks, and they used a long-toothed sprocket to drive the tracks. It might work to put one of those (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
