Subject:
|
Re: Motor mis-match.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:00:35 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Andy Gombos <GOMBOS_2000@YAHOOnomorespam.COM>
|
Viewed:
|
702 times
|
| |
|
|
I did it both ways, and got the same results(the order, not in exact speed). I
think that the motors are 'tuned' in some way, because random error cannot
occur 100% of the time. All motors went slower with the cable turned or the RCX
on 'Reverse', all of the time the when 'Forward'.
Andy
Shawn Menninga wrote:
> At 09:53 PM 1/14/01 -0600, you wrote:
>
> > I was having a boring evening - so I decided to test some theories
> > about Lego motors - and at the risk of seeming pedantic - here are
> > my findings:
>
> Did you reverse the motors by issuing the "Reverse" command on the
> RCX or by flipping the motor leads 180 degrees? In the first case,
> the observed slowing could easily be a property of the solid-state
> polarity switching circuitry in the RCX, where the second case would
> necessarily indicate an inherent property of the motor itself.
>
> Interesting experiment, though!
>
> -SMQ Shawn Menninga smq@dwarfrune.com
> --=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--
> "...to live deliberately...to put to rout all that [is] not life, and not,
> when I [have] come to die, discover that I [have] not lived." -- H. D. T.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Motor mis-match.
|
| At 09:53 PM 1/14/01 -0600, you wrote: > I was having a boring evening - so I decided to test some theories > about Lego motors - and at the risk of seeming pedantic - here are > my findings: Did you reverse the motors by issuing the "Reverse" (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
