 | | Re: Motor mis-match. —Shawn Menninga
|
| | | At 09:53 PM 1/14/01 -0600, you wrote: > I was having a boring evening - so I decided to test some theories > about Lego motors - and at the risk of seeming pedantic - here are > my findings: Did you reverse the motors by issuing the "Reverse" (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Motor mis-match. —Andy Gombos
|
| | | | | I did it both ways, and got the same results(the order, not in exact speed). I think that the motors are 'tuned' in some way, because random error cannot occur 100% of the time. All motors went slower with the cable turned or the RCX on 'Reverse', (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Motor mis-match. —John Barnes
|
| | | | Why not eliminate the vagueness of RCX's output circuitry altogether by running the motors from a stabilized bench supply set to 9.000 volts. That's is what I did when I characterized all my motors. I measured the rpm and wrote it on the bottom of (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
