 | | Re: 1999 Technic Car —David Forrest
|
| | | When I think of a "Super Car" I picture something like: (URL) think Lego should try to make a more detailed/complex car. The new super car look incomplete, and so did the old super car. Dave. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 1999 Technic Car —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Well, have you tried to make a car as detailed as Jonathan Stephenson's some time? I have, and let me tell you that the weight and shear number of pieces needed is unbelievable. I've used up to three large shock absorbers on each wheel and (...) (26 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1999 Technic Car —Chris Moseley
|
| | | | Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ... (...) No, I made a truck. With 10 suspension sets and 4 springs per set it was fairly firm while carrying the truck. But it definitely needed the support legs before lifting the crane arm up. Making a car that (...) (26 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1999 Technic Car —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Of course, but you're not the regular LEGO customer! ;-) (...) I agree. It is the nature of Technic models to be "incomplete", i.e. not have a body that covers the whole car. The Model Team range has "complete" models, and Jonathan combines (...) (26 years ago, 12-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
