Subject:
|
Re: REPLYTO field.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:11:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@!AntiSpam!mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> From: "Barney Rubble" <brub@SPAMLESS.bedrock.edu>
> Reply-To: "Barney Rubble" <brub@bedrock.edu>
Which seems silly because spam-harvesters can (and probably do) read the
reply-to header as well as the from one.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: REPLYTO field.
|
| (...) Another couple of reasons: If the 'Reply-To:' header is set to the list, then the probability goes way up that auto-reply handlers (i.e, "I'm on vacation" notices and so fort) will find their way to the list when they should have gone instead (...) (24 years ago, 12-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
