 | | Re: Quick question —Dean Husby
|
| | | (...) The current sets will go the way of the dodo bird. Take for example the 1.0. All of Lego's sites and instructions/books etc. mention the 1.5 set and use 1.5 pieces. No mention of 1.0 users. Lego moves on. They may come out with great future (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Quick question —Luis Villa
|
| | | | In Lego's defense, I think the once-a-year rule (at least when applied to the RCX) is less gimmick and more substance than it usually is for them. The 1.5 really did have more useful parts, and better documentation and parts. Looks like the 2.0 kits (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Quick question —Dean Husby
|
| | | | (...) I wasn't saying one way or the other. All I stated was that Lego products seem to hang around for a year then vanish. (I'm talking individual products here and not brands. [Mindstorms, system etc.]). The later 1.0's came with a free upgrade to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
