To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 10877
    Re: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts —Bert van Dam
   (...) Well, it's new and improved now :))) (...) No, I never built the real McCoy, but I did built the optocoupler. And that works ok, though not very fast. (...) No dice. I think we're all waiting for someone very rich or very brave. Or very stupid (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
   
        Re: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts —Zac Pollock
     (...) As my other post mentioned, I've played briefly with it. I don't fall into the very rich category so I guess I'll leave it up to the reader to choose between the latter two options :) Zac (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
   
        Re: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts —Marco C.
     (...) LOL !!!! Definitely, you're in the *VERY BRAVE* category ! eheheh :) Thxs for the info ! :) ___...___ Marco C. aka McViper (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
   
        RE: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts —Marco C.
   (...) eheheh, thxs David :) For me, you're in the very brave category ;) (nevertheless, there's always a thin line between an act of bravery and a stupid act, eheheh ;) PS: Hey, David !!!!! We're in the year 2000, already !!!! er... not 1988 :> (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR