To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 10889
10888  |  10890
Subject: 
Re: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:08:20 GMT
Original-From: 
Marco C. <{marco@soporcel.pt}StopSpam{}>
Viewed: 
777 times
  
At 21:31 01-03-2000 GMT, Zac Pollock wrote:
In lugnet.robotics, Bert van Dam writes:
Then I thought "what if someone already tried to connect directly an OUTPUT
to an INPUT ?" ...if that's possible, then it would even "simpler" to do a
CyberMaster<->Mindstorms pBrick interface :)
No dice. I think we're all waiting for someone very rich or very brave. Or
very stupid :)
As my other post mentioned, I've played briefly with it.  I don't fall into
the very rich category so I guess I'll leave it up to the reader to choose
between the latter two options :)

LOL !!!! Definitely, you're in the *VERY BRAVE* category ! eheheh :)

Thxs for the info ! :)
____________________
Marco C. aka McViper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Questions about unoficial (?) use of electrical LEGO parts
 
(...) Well, it's new and improved now :))) (...) No, I never built the real McCoy, but I did built the optocoupler. And that works ok, though not very fast. (...) No dice. I think we're all waiting for someone very rich or very brave. Or very stupid (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)

4 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
11 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR