Subject:
|
Re: Backlash
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:06:07 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Daniel A. Segel <daniels@netcom#ihatespam#.com>
|
Viewed:
|
853 times
|
| |
|
|
At 07:21 AM 01/21/2000 -0500, Andy Gombos wrote:
> Okay, if I understand backlash correctly, then if you use pulleys and
> belts, then that should be taken away, or at least reduced. Am I
> correct? If I am right, then it may be possible to make a robot that
> really knows where it is. :-)
Pulleys and belts have their own form of backlash that is induced by the
stretching and slipping of the belt. At least with gears the backlash is a
constant that could be accounted for. With belt-drive you'd never know
exactly how much of a problem you have.
Daniel
--
"Being humble is why I'm a great person."
Daniel A. Segel
daniels@netcom.com
--
MIME ATTACHMENTS DISCARDED:
1. Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 767
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Backlash
|
| Okay, if I understand backlash correctly, then if you use pulleys and belts, then that should be taken away, or at least reduced. Am I correct? If I am right, then it may be possible to make a robot that really knows where it is. :-) Andy (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
