 | | Re: events /nxt vs. events/rcx
|
|
(...) Sigh... "good luck"? I don't mean to sound too negative, but this is a hard nut to crack under the standard FW I think... at least I've yet to figure out a way to do it to my satisfaction. In fact, more than almost any other single point, this (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
(...) I'll forward this to Laurent. (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
"Claude Baumann" <cbaumann@ci.educ.lu> wrote in message news:JIvFwD.5C3@lugnet.com... (...) Exciting stuff! A friend and I have been using the PICKit2 recently for a range of chips including 12f's and 16f's. So far my personal favorite has been the (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
(...) Any chance you'll add PIC18F8520 to the supported list of PICs? Guy Ziv (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | events /nxt vs. events/rcx
|
|
Hi, I tried to write some code to simulate the events like in RCX. It starts to look cluttered. I understand that NXT VM does not support events like you find in the RCX. Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated! Elizabeth (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
(...) The PICkit comes with a little PC board with a 16F690 on it. I don't know how that compares to the 16F88, but it does have a synchronous serial port. (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
(...) Philo sent me an email to attract my attention to registered trademarks of the Microchip Company among which PICLAB -all capitals. But, as ours is a non-commercial software, and we are using lower cases for the 2 final letters, this should not (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | documentation on bt / nxc
|
|
I have two bots set up some meaningful ack and nack conversation. However, when one bot/slave lost connection, e.g. terminated abruptly, the sender (master) does not notice that it indeed lost it. The ReceiveRemoteNumber(INBOX, true, ack) does not (...) (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate ROBOLAB for PICs
|
|
(...) We actually worked a lot with the 16F88, which is a really great chip, something like a combination of the 16F628 and 16F819. But we didn't play with the I2C module on it yet. So that must obviously be our next challenge. (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | name your nxt
|
|
Hi, SetBrickDataName(str) seems to be able to only change the name of the nxt temporarily. Once the nxt is started, it loses the name assigned thru the SetBrickDataName earlier. Idea? --Elizabeth (18 years ago, 31-May-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
