 | | Re: which would you choose?
|
|
(...) <homer simpson> Mmmmm, Back Hoe. </home simpson> Lots of funky pneumatics stuff in the Back Hoe, great for making manually operated robots and cool technic models. You'll never control all that pneumatics with the 3 outputs of the RCX though, (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: which would you choose?
|
|
(...) How many RCX's do you own? If it's just 1, then get RIS 2.0 and get an add'l RCX at some discount on Brickbay or something If you have tons of Technic anyway, the add'l RIS parts is pretty much irrelevant--you'd get them from the 'Hoe and (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | which would you choose?
|
|
I am trying to decide which i should get out of the following two options. I am asking for some opionions as to which you would get and why: 1. RIS 2.0 Builders Kit (Contains RIS, Ultimate Builders Set and Ultimate Accessory Kit) Back Hoe (Mainly (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: leJOS & BricxCC news
|
|
(...) OK, I've looked at your wish list and have the following comments with respect to how I see the pbForth implementation of DCC. 1. How important is it to have more than one port with DCC capabilities. The reason I'm asking is that it "would be (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: USB Tower Performance [was leJOS/BricxCC news]
|
|
(...) Doh! I forgot about Odd parity and the USB tower. I will see about fixing that little problem. Is your quad speed boot loader source significantly different from Kekoa's fastdl.s (with the parity disabling code removed)? I'd like to see it if (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: leJOS & BricxCC news
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I was seriously considering writing a leJOS package to support the LDCC IR Protocol. (Here's why: (URL) ) What capabilities were you going to add? Depending on your timeline, you might convince me to try FORTH. (22 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: pbForth & ROLL
|
|
(...) John, As always, it depends. ROLL can sometimes be recovered gracefully, but not always. If you ROLL more than the stack depth, you'll shift some RAM that you probably don't want to shift - like the pbForth image itself. In that case, there's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | pbForth & ROLL
|
|
(...) While testing my console the other day I kept getting pbForth to hang (or so it appeared). It turns out I was passing ROLL a number that caused it to do bad things. I'm wondering whether it should error out with "aborted stack underflow" or (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: USB Tower Performance [was leJOS/BricxCC news]
|
|
In a recent post, John Hansen raised some questions about USB Tower [1] quad speed downloading and [2] varioustimeouts and difficulty with certain optocdes. Here's a bit of an explanation. Lots of technical detail for those that are interested. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Mindstorms Robotic Sumo Question
|
|
(...) Thanks Steve! Everything I wanted to know I found out on that website. Great information. Thanks again! David Perdue www.geocities.com/imroboguy (22 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.events, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
