 | | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
(...) I guess that's because of regulatory issues. Getting anything with radio transmission approved for all countries Lego wants to sell in can prove a daunting task... And IR can prove very effective: did you try Spybotics remote control? it (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
"Gareth Bestor" <bestorga@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:H4E4uq.JvL@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) eyeing (...) receiver (...) reveiver (...) I've also followed this intresting thread. And now I'm wondering why Lego have used the infrared (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
I should have removed the word "messenger". After all, doing something by "proxy" would imply a messenger-type role. What I meant was, for DeviceA to send a message to DeviceB, they would have to use some sort of proxy or router between them (the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Telerobot
|
|
(...) (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Cracking open the RCX
|
|
(URL) B" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:E1846MB-0007HP-...url.com... (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
