 | | ***legOS new name : deadline is 18.07.***
|
|
As Steve mentioned, the 23.07. is too late for the announcement of the new name at Brickfest. I think it would be great to do so, so I decided to make the deadline at Thursday, 18.07. I will publish the new name around midnight of the 18.07 and (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | lnp error message..huh?
|
|
woolley thnx for the tip on checking the RCX memory.. now i have another question.. after having run continous messages back and forth between the RCX and my program on my PC for ~10 minutes. i get this error message: ---...--- Transmit error: (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
(...) I'd built a maze solver. When the solver makes a step (for example forward) it uses the light sensor to search for a wall and the rotation sensor to measure the distance it has traveled. If a wall is hit, the solver steps back until it reaches (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
"Joel Uddén" wrote (...) not (...) Actually, each task gets equal "wakeup" checking. The only difference between a low priority task and a high priority task is that the high priority task gets a larger time-slice when it is awake. This is not an (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
(...) Thanks for the link, your solution of proportional timeslicing is more straightforward than mine which I like. The only downside would be that a high prioritized process would have it's wakeup conditions checked less frequently than a low (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Intervista su BimP
|
|
Sorry, the message is in Italian because it was addressed to lugnet.loc.it. Didn't realize I was on the .robotics ng when I clickked the New button... Mario "Mario Ferrari" <mario.ferrari@edis.it> ha scritto: (...) su (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
kenneth, I believe the code you are looking for is used in program.c (for LegOS v0.2.6) When you press the View button (with no program running) LegOS will show you "FREE", press again, you will get the most significant portion of the free memory (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) When I said "three degrees of freedom" - I didn't mean "X-Y-Z", I mean't X, Y and Rotation-about-Z. Whilst (in theory) a Killough platform moves in X and Y only - they do rotate a little in practice. (...) From reading the specifications for (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) I don't think anyone has actually *tried* this yet - but it's still worth discussing the *other* issues since we wouldn't want to go to the hassle of ripping apart mice until it's evident that it *could* work. The data stream from the mouse is (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
