|
|
 | | Re: GUI for legOS
|
| Michael, What I am hearing here and have heard in the past, along with my own personal experience, is that developing for legOS under Windows and more specific cygwin can be or is a pretty difficult task. Compounded on top of that is if you have (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | N. California Sites/Events?
|
| Are there any Lego events going on in N. Calif. in the next month? Are there any used part sources in this area? I'd like to pick up some misc. bricks for RIS 2.0. -- Wayne T. Watson (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N, 2,701 feet), Nevada City, CA Crop (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: red universal joint
|
| (...) (URL) and (URL) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | L-Rex Escapes
|
| I have just finished L-Rex a new biped that I have created using technic/mindstorms check out www.lbrick.com (in the projects section) for more information/pictures and feel free to let me know what you think. (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | red universal joint
|
| This is totally out of the blue (or the grey, or something like that). Several months ago, there was a discussion in this group about the different types of universal joints LEGO has made. One person claimed to have seen a red universal joint in a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Kronos
|
| Any fellow bot-builders working at Kronos, Inc., in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, USA? Just curious, as I start in the Engineering building tomorrow. Doug Wilcox 30 George Street Brockton, MA 02302 508-584-6853 508-284-4408 cell (23 years ago, 16-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) Forth was my second language (after Basic). The hours I spent at user group lectures sweating the fine points of stack management and memory allocation were a fabulous preparation for programming. If you survive the experience, that is. You (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) You change a bit, ask questions, re-write the code to solve the problem differently. Then go back and figure out what conceptual mistake was made the first time through. This is EXACTLY the same process you go through on a PC. (...) By trying (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) It's a fine language as long as the potential user understands how to use dual-stack based languages/systems (ie TIL's). I suggest folks who want to learn Forth get themselves a good grounding in RPN. From there it's the same old same old with (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: intro and question
|
| (...) The problem with learning on an embedded system is not *what* you have to learn - its *how* you have to learn it. If you make any of a dozen basic programming mistakes on an RCX, what's going to happen? Well, maybe a motor will turn on when it (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
