 | | Re: fast firmware downloader
|
|
(...) Actually, lots of packages try to deal with filenames intelligently. QT, for example, has normal C++ NamingConventions, but uses lowercaseonly file names. I try to do the same. Notice how direct-sensor.h became dsensor.h in 0.2.0, as well as (...) (26 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: fast firmware downloader
|
|
(...) I tried to do a DJGPP build of binutils and it didn't work for me. I really didn't want to spend more time futzing with the tools, and I was already using Cygwin, so I used one of the precompiled toolsets. I think you are just a lazy typer, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: fast firmware downloader
|
|
(...) Yeah. Not sure about the hardware interface, though. Would it be possible to run the DOS executable to generate a binary and then download it otherwise? I too am not sure what this whole discussion is about- if it is just NQC, then it is (...) (26 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: fast firmware downloader
|
|
I hate to admit it, but the version of Turbo C++ I just pulled out is 1.00. I departed from the Borland compiler shortly after acquiring this version and did not keep up with advances. Would I gain any advantages by finding a later version, or (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | walker that turns?
|
|
¡hola! Has somebody worked on a walker that could turn? Some ideas of how to do it? Thanks, HoraPe --- Horacio J. Peña horape@compendium.com.ar horape@uninet.edu bofh@puntoar.net.ar horape@hcdn.gov.ar (26 years ago, 30-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: lego Technic "class"
|
|
Chris Phillips wrote in message ... (...) pushing (...) Chris, Thanks for the insight! They say, curiosity killed the cat.... Good thing I'm not a cat! I opened one of my motors and took photos for everyone to enjoy. (URL) Chris, I also was unable (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 availablilty
|
|
(...) That and Lego must be investing in battery companies ... :) -Lee. (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: 1.5
|
|
(...) I ordered the 1.5 upgrade over the net on Thursday for $24.99 plus $6.00 for shipping and got a confirmation back on Friday claiming a ten day delivery time. We'll just have to see how it goes. JaB (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English
|
|
I've missed the parts list comparison between 1.0 and 1.5. Can anyone tell me where I can get this information? Thanks, Ankesh Kadakia The WordMeister wrote in message <01bf2267$7eae6f00$2...ci.net>... (...) TLG) (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Scans of Constructopedia 1.0 English
|
|
(...) (URL) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
