 | | Re: 6776 Ogel Control Center Set Review
|
|
(...) The comment wasn't directed at you, just... information. I guess you never played your records backwards to hear the evil zombie producing messages that some bands (minions of all things dark that they were) deliberatly encoded into the (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Ogel Control Center Set Review
|
|
(...) Good Lord! That *NEVER* would have occurred to me...! Like, not in a bazillion years. Yeeesh! ...still a very poor choice for the name of the villain. Makes me want to change my grading to a 7 of 10. (...) No comment. =:o| I think I forgot to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Ogel Control Center Set Review
|
|
(...) It is (for those not paying attention) LEGO backwards. (...) I take it "she" hasn't seen bucketmouth yet... James (who's not sure why he's replying regarding the naming of minifigs...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 6776 Ogel Control Center Set Review
|
|
6776 Ogel Control Center Set Reviewed Overall comments in brief: Great set! 8 of 10, I had to mark it down a tad because of juniorization and some design flaws (Hey, stop leading me by the nose with these instructions unless the instructions make (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS X-Wing Review
|
|
(...) These pieces are from Scala. They're used as lamp-bases and vases and such. But in the Scala sets, they tend to be in pastel colors, not dark gray. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: UCS X-Wing Review
|
|
(...) Hi, I have finish the part with Ldraw (33008.dat). This Piece is an Engine Pipe I mean. I don't now if this part is use in Duplo??? Marc Schickele (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
(...) How the heck did you use the car brick (2x6 with wheels) on a castle? A friend of mine uses the 2x6 bricks as technic skateboards, though that makes the launcher in the middle virtually useless. I found that the little "gargoyles" make good (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
(...) I agree with your general impressions, except that ... (...) ... this is too high a price to pay for 3 (semi)useful pieces and some rubberbands. I don't count the SPUD/POOP chassis or the soft plastic slammer, because I don't feel they are (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
We have Surfer and Shredd. I was disappointed that the wheels are fixed, since I wanted to make and all-blue racer. My kids found the "slammer" action to be frustrating. It was too hard to actually launch two cars and hit each other. The driver (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
Bradley Dale <dinosauria_ca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:G9CKIJ.7MF@lugnet.com... I too bought one of these at the weekend. I wasn't that impressed, but my daughter, in the target age range, liked it. (...) The 2x2 curved slope used on the front (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
RACERS have LEGO studs on 'em! They have two cool decorated Spaceish elements. The driver is a 2x2 brick and can be used as a little gargoyle. I used the car brick on a Castle tower MOC today, so it is not useless! You just gotta be creative with (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Pleasure.....
|
|
Indeed, although I've never personally seen one, I'm told by those who should know (race car drivers) that if you crack the transfer case on a number of modern cars, lo and behold, you will find a heavy-duty chain. as evah, John C. (...) [SNIP] (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Pleasure.....
|
|
(...) Personally, I think the 8880 and the Technic Space Shuttle are the best two LEGO sets of all time. I built my 8880 over 3 years ago - it's on display in the house to educate all non-Lego visitors and I still can't bear to break it up. Onto the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 7317 review (was Re: New Stuff In Stock :)))))) wehheeeeeeee :)
|
|
(...) Ahem. Wanna lose them my way?????!!!!! ROSCO (The boring generic large-scale constructor) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 7317 review (was Re: New Stuff In Stock :)))))) wehheeeeeeee :)
|
|
Peter White wrote in message ... (...) Hehe, funnily enough I logged back on to give just such a review on the Hangar... I've just finished building it and I thought I'd share my thoughts. PARTS: It has some great parts, a lot of boring but (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure, currently I don't own a scanner or a digital camera but I'll try to get some up on BrickShelf. (...) It's hard to measure force, but you don't need a lot. The transport modules are molded, so only Martians will fit in. I've tried (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) Like a 2x2x2 brown wooden barrel? Nope. Just a hair too big. The problem is the bottom of the tube is notched in (which provides a rail for the sled to ride on). The inner diameter of the tube is just over 2 studs, but because of the notch is (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) I would like to know the size of the tubes. Can you shoot barrel-sized things through it? (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
"Kevin McMillin" <mcmillins@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:G7u1qv.8D1@lugnet.com... (...) goes (...) How soon can you get a few pictures of this set up? (...) How powerful is the force applied to the sleds in the tubes? Can the transport (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
Well, my 7317 arrived yesterday; had it built by late last night, here goes my review: There are 706 pieces, including: 16 3x1 Purple slopes, 5 Martians (Rigel, Cassiopeia, Arctures, Mizar and Vega) 3 Molded sleds (2 black, 1 glow-in-the-dark) for (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
