 | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | People, I feel I must put my two cents in. First I admit that the UCS X-Wing is a masterpiece, and put my own large scale X-wing to shame...however. Picture this set with a good percentage more light grey pieces (or white), for a more uniform look (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | No complaints, that is (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | (...) That's something I wondered... How come they decided that White was the primary color of the X-wing, when it's really more of an off-white/gray in the movies? White looks a little bit too "clean"... but its not really a gripe, just curious. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh, and another question about the UCS TIE Interceptor... In the hand-out catalog, the ship details are gray (as I think they are on the box). In the S@H catalog, they are Blue! So which one is true to the actual model? ObUCSX-Wing: One thing (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | | | Karim, there are no stickers with the UCS Tie...front "canopy" is pre-printed. Ship detail? Not sure I follow you there, elaborate. (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I mean the trimwork... the small details such as the running piping around the solar panels... is it gray or blue? --Karim (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) printed. (...) Blue. The little shovels and stuff are dark grey. Frank (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | | | Oh, gotcha...well, it's actually both. The piping and trim is blue, as is the radar dishes stuck to the outboard sides of the "wings." There is also a bit of dark grey paneling on the outboard sides as well. There are some unique pieces, too. (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | I think the whole color issue is pretty difficult to deal with in the case of the UCS X-wing. The mini-fig X-wing is easy enough to accept in light grey, but I think a UCS X-wing in all light grey would not look very authentic. I think TLG should (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Patrick Baumgardner
|
| | | | | | I totally agree that TLG should have used more light gray than they did. When I had finished building mine, I compared it to a picture in the Star Wars Technical Journal by Shane Johnson. While the Lego model was very close in appearence to an (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | | Yup, much better...just gutted the Falcon and replaced all the goofy red and blue parts with light and dark grey pieces, what an improvement! UCS X-Wing is next (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: UCS X-Wing Review —James Simpson
|
| | | | (...) When I first saw the on-line pictures of the 2 UCS ships, my first impression was that the X-Wing would be the better of the two because it just seemed to be richer in details. Weekend before last I had a small Lego-fest with an out-of- town (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
