Subject:
|
Re: Juniorized?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.reviews
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 May 2000 13:29:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1787 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks. I've come across a few of these combo units already. Kinda thought
they wasted the ABS.
--
~mek~
(remove cc from atkincc to email me)
Adrian Drake wrote in message ...
> Typically, the easiest way to tell sets are juniorized is the large-scale • use
> of vehicle chassis (chassises, chassi, whatever) with axles and slopes, • etc,
> built in. The worst culprit, by far, of this syndrome are the Rock Raiders
> sets, which contain hugely monstrous (and exceedingly lame) chassis pieces.
>
> Parts get juniorized by being combined with other parts to create pieces • that
> tend to serve only one purpose, and would be much more useful if they were
> made of their constituent pieces instead.
>
> Adrian
> --
> http://junior.apk.net/~tremor/lego.html
>
> In lugnet.reviews, Mike Kelly writes:
> > I've seen mention of this and was curious, how do you know if a part has
> > been juniorized?
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~mek~
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Juniorized?
|
| Typically, the easiest way to tell sets are juniorized is the large-scale use of vehicle chassis (chassises, chassi, whatever) with axles and slopes, etc, built in. The worst culprit, by far, of this syndrome are the Rock Raiders sets, which contain (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.reviews)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
