 | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
Bradley Dale <dinosauria_ca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:G9CKIJ.7MF@lugnet.com... I too bought one of these at the weekend. I wasn't that impressed, but my daughter, in the target age range, liked it. (...) The 2x2 curved slope used on the front (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
|
RACERS have LEGO studs on 'em! They have two cool decorated Spaceish elements. The driver is a 2x2 brick and can be used as a little gargoyle. I used the car brick on a Castle tower MOC today, so it is not useless! You just gotta be creative with (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Pleasure.....
|
|
Indeed, although I've never personally seen one, I'm told by those who should know (race car drivers) that if you crack the transfer case on a number of modern cars, lo and behold, you will find a heavy-duty chain. as evah, John C. (...) [SNIP] (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Pleasure.....
|
|
(...) Personally, I think the 8880 and the Technic Space Shuttle are the best two LEGO sets of all time. I built my 8880 over 3 years ago - it's on display in the house to educate all non-Lego visitors and I still can't bear to break it up. Onto the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 7317 review (was Re: New Stuff In Stock :)))))) wehheeeeeeee :)
|
|
(...) Ahem. Wanna lose them my way?????!!!!! ROSCO (The boring generic large-scale constructor) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 7317 review (was Re: New Stuff In Stock :)))))) wehheeeeeeee :)
|
|
Peter White wrote in message ... (...) Hehe, funnily enough I logged back on to give just such a review on the Hangar... I've just finished building it and I thought I'd share my thoughts. PARTS: It has some great parts, a lot of boring but (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure, currently I don't own a scanner or a digital camera but I'll try to get some up on BrickShelf. (...) It's hard to measure force, but you don't need a lot. The transport modules are molded, so only Martians will fit in. I've tried (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) Like a 2x2x2 brown wooden barrel? Nope. Just a hair too big. The problem is the bottom of the tube is notched in (which provides a rail for the sled to ride on). The inner diameter of the tube is just over 2 studs, but because of the notch is (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
(...) I would like to know the size of the tubes. Can you shoot barrel-sized things through it? (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LoM 7317 Aero Tube Hangar REVIEW!
|
|
"Kevin McMillin" <mcmillins@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:G7u1qv.8D1@lugnet.com... (...) goes (...) How soon can you get a few pictures of this set up? (...) How powerful is the force applied to the sleds in the tubes? Can the transport (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
