 | | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Ya! I like this. Todd told me offline he's thinking of empowering someone to do some content organization in the /reviews/ part of LUGNET. Bad idea. This is somewhere where the bazaar method is presenting us a ready made answer, although it isn't (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) If this is something I could install or have installed on my domain (guarded-inn.com) and then let someone else have the responsibility for maintaining it, I wouldn't mind hosting it. Since this would all be text (or mostly) I can't see space (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) --snipped-- (...) that sounds like it has good potential...i'd just be concerned with how permanent such a site is, how much space we'd have, and how to protect contributors' ownership rights. have others dealt with faqomatic sites? ..joseph g (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Hmmmmm......I Could do all that with just a faqomatic site. Then I could dish out access to people who showed promise. Or I could allow free access, and have moderators. Anyone have ideas? I could set up a working site in a day. A snazzy one (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I know that Larry's post is in response to Jeff Johnston's original post but I wanted to share my ideas on the matter. I'm quite bummed about the way things have gone at adequate.com. I edited around twenty reviews that have been waiting to be (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I did, and it hasn't. Yet, anyway. But this is a hobby, he may not have gotten round to it yet. :-) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 4561 Railway Express newbie review
|
|
I built the 4561 train over the weekend and offer the following observations. I am a newbie to trains so please know that my comments are relative. 1.) The supply of windows is great. 2.) The amount of track-- relative to the length of the train-- (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Ahh, cool, and here it is... (URL) THE review format. :) (...) If you posted it to RTL, then the place I'd would expect it to have shown up would be on Joshua's site, at the rec.toys.lego LEGO Set Review Archive: (URL) you posted it using THE (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Be sure to include in your 8448 review: "...truly inspired by the 956, but built with the structural nuances of the 8480 Space Shuttle. Definately not another 8880, but strangely that's a plus." KL (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
What's your format? I have a 3225 I sent to Adequate.com a year ago, almost, and it hasn't been posted yet (it was posted to RTL I think) so at this point I would send it to any site that would publish it. Or is this your own reviews only? (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
