 | | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Agreed wholeheartedly, as I opened the box and removed the instructions I found that just travelling to my house had caused a severe rip in the spine. There was a rip on the front cover in the bottom left hand corner. However, after assembly, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
One other point I forgot to mention in my original review ... The massive instruction book (228 A3 pages) is too heavy for its style of binding and the covers quickly detached from the rest of the book as I started to turn through the pages. And (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
"Bryan Wong" <green_paper@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H7wB7H.GFs@lugnet.com... (...) small (...) being (...) many (...) Uh? Was it a typo? I thought i should be like that and built one flush against the edge and the other 1 stud away. When (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Ah, yes, now I remember. The rest of the manual all showed one dome 1 stud away, but on the pictures both are flush. I just put mine flush, I think it's a typo. I snapped a picture with my camera of it: (URL) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if it was only me, but I noticed some discrepancies with the deflector shield domes ("golf balls"). Most steps show one dome flush against the edge of the plate it sits on, and the other dome 1 stud away from the edge. Can someone (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
"Kerry Raymond" <kerry@dstc.edu.au> wrote in message news:H7szBH.CAG@lugnet.com... (...) ISD] <snip> (...) together, (...) greatest (...) (in (...) I agree about the unusual use of the magnets. They are a bit weak, yes. But If you take in count (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
Hey Kerry, While I'll agree that the model is not easily handled and cannot be swooshed around, I wasn't disappointed by this at all. In fact, I expected it. Given it's scale, the model would have to be glued together to be sturdy enough (horrors!). (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Agreed. While the magnet idea is cool, it is simply not strong enough. Even Though the magnets do not take all the strain, they still tend to slip and disconnect. For the most part, I didn't have much trouble, but when I began putting any (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
Kerry, your review was most thorough! I do not have the time nor the patience to type an equally thorough response. However, I respond just hours after completing my own ISD...I must say you are being too critical of the model's integrity. I would (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | 8353 Slammer Rhino review
|
|
8353 Slammer Rhino Racers / Technic (but does not say Technic anywhere) (URL) 8+ Pieces: 218 Released: 2003 100 page manual 2 models Price: $30 (CDN), $20 (US) RATINGS (Scale: Must-Have Excellent Very-Good Good Fair Poor) Set: Excellent Models: (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
10030 System / Star Wars / Ultimate Collector Series Imperial Star Destroyer [official Lego name, abbreviated henceforth to ISD] Natasha Stott Despoja [unofficial lugnet.loc.au name] Ages 16+, 3104 pieces, (C) 2002 [so says the box] Manual: 228 A3 (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Sounds like TLC are getting more than set ideas from Ritvik... ROSCO (Now proud owner of 2 flimsy sets...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) See, all it takes is one steely glance from Richie's death ray eyes and it's history! Kerry (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Having now seen this in the ABS (thanks, Kerry!), I can vouch for it's fragility. It fell apart even as I watched... The wide expanses of grey plates are stunning, but also very wobbly. Another layer of plates (or technic beams or something) (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) Flimsy indeed. Mine kept breaking apart as I tried to assemble it. Much cursing and swearing was required. Finally when I had just got the thing finished, I sat back exhausted and then my cat walked past, put her paw onto the side of it, and (...) (22 years ago, 10-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New Harry Potter sets
|
|
(...) ..ack! Brain fart.. Saw the ".edu" in the address and completely spaced the ".au" after it... +------/|---...---+---...---+ | | | djlong@wildwizards.net \ | | / | \ | | ( ) (URL) \ ICQ# 8976662 | +----`--' ---...---+---...---+ (22 years ago, 3-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
|
|
(...) I applaud your thoroughness, however, regarding the following passage: "...the tester decided not to continue out of fear for the strength of the Baron’s tailskid (his sole LEGO brown minifig shovel). It may well have survived four more (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
|
|
(...) I conducted some experiments last night.... see (URL) for details. No charts yet, though :-) Richie (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
(...) (URL) (inventory not confirmed) With thanks to TLC ROSCO (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
|
General info about the set which I needn't regurgitate for you: (URL) recieved this on Wednesday night and commenced construction at 10pm. At noon the next day, it was finished after having worked for 14 hours non-stop. The building marathon was (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
