Subject:
|
Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 05:00:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4713 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Richie Dulin writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
> > > I'm rather disappointed with the construction method, which is both flimsy
> > > (the top levels just sit on top rather than connect) and also uses magnets
> > > to keep the panels on - the latter being a bad point in my book. The whole
> > > thing is very hard to pick up without risking the collapse of the panelled
> > > underside. Fortunately as a display piece this isn't hugely relevant, but
> > > it's still annoying.
> >
> > Flimsy indeed. Mine kept breaking apart as I tried to assemble it. Much cursing
> > and swearing was required. Finally when I had just got the thing finished, I
> > sat back exhausted and then my cat walked past, put her paw onto the side of
> > it, and it fell over sidewise and collapsed into many chunks. I finally rebuilt
> > it today (more cursing and swearing).
>
> Having now seen this in the ABS (thanks, Kerry!), I can vouch for it's
> fragility. It fell apart even as I watched...
Sounds like TLC are getting more than set ideas from Ritvik...
ROSCO (Now proud owner of 2 flimsy sets...)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
| (...) Having now seen this in the ABS (thanks, Kerry!), I can vouch for it's fragility. It fell apart even as I watched... The wide expanses of grey plates are stunning, but also very wobbly. Another layer of plates (or technic beams or something) (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
