To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / *1017 (-10)
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) I'm not sure if it was only me, but I noticed some discrepancies with the deflector shield domes ("golf balls"). Most steps show one dome flush against the edge of the plate it sits on, and the other dome 1 stud away from the edge. Can someone (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
"Kerry Raymond" <kerry@dstc.edu.au> wrote in message news:H7szBH.CAG@lugnet.com... (...) ISD] <snip> (...) together, (...) greatest (...) (in (...) I agree about the unusual use of the magnets. They are a bit weak, yes. But If you take in count (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
Hey Kerry, While I'll agree that the model is not easily handled and cannot be swooshed around, I wasn't disappointed by this at all. In fact, I expected it. Given it's scale, the model would have to be glued together to be sturdy enough (horrors!). (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) Agreed. While the magnet idea is cool, it is simply not strong enough. Even Though the magnets do not take all the strain, they still tend to slip and disconnect. For the most part, I didn't have much trouble, but when I began putting any (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
Kerry, your review was most thorough! I do not have the time nor the patience to type an equally thorough response. However, I respond just hours after completing my own ISD...I must say you are being too critical of the model's integrity. I would (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  8353 Slammer Rhino review
 
8353 Slammer Rhino Racers / Technic (but does not say Technic anywhere) (URL) 8+ Pieces: 218 Released: 2003 100 page manual 2 models Price: $30 (CDN), $20 (US) RATINGS (Scale: Must-Have Excellent Very-Good Good Fair Poor) Set: Excellent Models: (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
 
  Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
10030 System / Star Wars / Ultimate Collector Series Imperial Star Destroyer [official Lego name, abbreviated henceforth to ISD] Natasha Stott Despoja [unofficial lugnet.loc.au name] Ages 16+, 3104 pieces, (C) 2002 [so says the box] Manual: 228 A3 (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au) ! 
 
  Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) Sounds like TLC are getting more than set ideas from Ritvik... ROSCO (Now proud owner of 2 flimsy sets...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) See, all it takes is one steely glance from Richie's death ray eyes and it's history! Kerry (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
 
(...) Having now seen this in the ABS (thanks, Kerry!), I can vouch for it's fragility. It fell apart even as I watched... The wide expanses of grey plates are stunning, but also very wobbly. Another layer of plates (or technic beams or something) (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR