 | | Some Questions...
|
| Can somebody show me an example of a 1.3 megapixel picture? Is 1.3 MP acceptable? Does less resolution = less quality? Does anybody have, or have used an Argus 1.3 megapixel DC3200 digicam?If so, can you review it? Thanks for your time, -JHK (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| (...) I bought my first digital camera in March, and I've never heard of Argus. Kodak made a model called the DC3200, but it was only 1.0 megapixel, and Kodaks don't seem to get the best reviews. This site (that I heard about here on Lugnet) is (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| (...) How importent is macro? And what is the cheapest camera that has it? What do you think is the 'average' closest focus? (without macro) (...) Well, the sale I have is online. :-/ (...) Argus makes a few digicams. (URL) retail price for the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| (...) It's crucial if you're taking pics of your MOCs. (...) I don't know for sure, but I would expect any camera >1.0Mp would have a macro mode. When I tried out the Canon A20 (2.1Mp) I could only get within about one foot of the subject, WITH (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| <snip> Well, guess what my dad brought home tonight: (URL) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| (...) well...that is cool...we'll be able to see some of your great work in the very near future!!! Benjamin Medinets (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Some Questions...
|
| (...) Not bad for $70! ;) I'm sure you'll be very pleased with it. Jeff J (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| |
