 | | Re: B-Wing DAT file —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) No... It's a discussion group for discussing issues/topics relating to publishing, like making web pages and choosing and ISP and photography & cameras and stuff. Here is a repost of the charter: CHARTER/PURPOSE: lugnet.publish (group): (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: B-Wing DAT file —Kevin B(?)
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <361ea906.149108092@...et.com>... (...) Then I think a lugnet.modeling should be made. That way people can publish (oops, did I say that?) their creations for the world at large to enjoy. (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: B-Wing DAT file —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) How would lugnet.modeling differ from lugnet.build? Followups set to lugnet.admin.general... --Todd (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: B-Wing DAT file —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Oh.... but I just _assumed_ it...... Consider me chastised. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Where to post .DAT files —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Consider yourself 100% exonerated (hmm, that sounds like a bad word, even though it's a good word) since this discussion morphed beautifully into a productive "how to publish" thread, with your .DAT file serving as "the" example. :) I think (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Where to post .DAT files —Patrick Gili
|
| | | | | This is acceptable. However, as Sarah pointed out, only those with an appropriate "viewer" would know what these files really contain. Perhaps it would be good to have a link from LUGNET somewhere to sites supporting viewers, maybe even a FAQ that (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Where to post .DAT files —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Now I've been made an example of. Will my humiliation never end? :-) Now kids, I hope I've set a good example. Don't let this happen to you. (...) Sounds good to me. A supgroup of .cad probably would not be needed, unless a very large quantity (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
