 | | Re: Happy 5th Birthday, MOCpages!
|
|
(...) Nice work Sean!!! Congrats on five great years and here's to many, many more. Over the past year or two I have found MOCPages to be a very valuable resource and a great place to share MOC's with other LEGO fans. It is a well designed site that (...) (17 years ago, 2-Apr-08, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Blue, now the New Green!
|
|
(...) Wow! The new green works really well, allowing the creations to stand out against the background, despite its obvious brightness and interest. It's remarkable how the overall effect of same creations, in the same pose, can appear to change (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-08, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Blue, now the New Green!
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Eric Sophie wrote: The Blue (URL) for Mecha-Tech 2048x1360>> (URL) Blue ESLC 2008©> Now the New Green! (URL) for Mecha-Tech 2048x1360>> (URL) Green ESLC 2008©> Enjoy! (URL) Eric Sophie> (17 years ago, 5-Feb-08, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Logo
|
|
(...) Hi Florian, A logo is meant to serve as an identity mark. That's his role. Logically, that's a very personal sign. I can't really see a logo being "generic". Of course a logo can be used to identify a community, group or company. The Lugnet (...) (17 years ago, 3-Feb-08, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: The Blue, the Red or the Green?
|
|
(...) They all look nice, but I think the blue is the coolest - it gives the best contrast to all three mechs. The red tends to subdue the red mech, and the grey fades a bit against the green. Nice work all round, though. Thanks for sharing! Cheers (...) (17 years ago, 3-Feb-08, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Blue, the Red or the Green?
|
|
The Blue (URL) for Mecha-Tech 2048x1360>> (URL) Blue ESLC 2008©> The Red (URL) for Mecha-Tech 2048x1360>> (URL) Red ESLC 2008©> The Green (URL) for Mecha-Tech 2048x1360>> (URL) Green ESLC 2008©> (URL) ESLC 2008© Original> (URL) 800x531 ESLC 2008© (...) (17 years ago, 2-Feb-08, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | MOC Logo
|
|
Hello everybody, I'd like to find out whether anybody has ever created a general "Logo for LEGO MOCs"? I am thinking of a symbol which looks like the official LEGO logo, but instead of the letters "LEGO" features the letters "MOC" or "LMOC" or (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jan-08, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Book Shows How to Build Lego Guns, Catapults
|
|
(...) I think this is my favorite line from the article: quote The Daily Telegraph dubbed the tome "the Anarchist Cookbook of the nursery" /quote thats just funny. steve (17 years ago, 17-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Book Shows How to Build Lego Guns, Catapults
|
|
(...) Looks like the article got one of the creations mislabeled. The second picture in the article is the "Coated Candy Catapult". the Ping-Pong Ball launcher is a different creation. The thing is--some of the key parts to make the plate shooter (...) (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Book Shows How to Build Lego Guns, Catapults
|
|
(...) I think I improperly catagorized this... Moved to .mediawatch -Eric (17 years ago, 15-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
I'll say: I'm impressed. Really. A lot! Fantastic issue - my congratulations. Though I fear my kids and my lack of spare time will cut short any effort to achieve similar building success, I like a lot of the ideas I am getting from this issue. (...) (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Book Shows How to Build Lego Guns, Catapults
|
|
(...) This reads like fun - I just ordered a copy because the movie linked to from the article shows me it's exactly the kind of gear that I've been after for office use (*imagine rather evil grin here*) I'll have to keep it away from the kids, (...) (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | New Book Shows How to Build Lego Guns, Catapults
|
|
This article is kind of funny. The very conservative Fox News is taking a shot at "the constantly hysterical press" in Britain. (URL) Kingsley (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
I know this is late, however, I just wanted to let you know that I downloaded the issue and I think its really wonderful. I am looking forward to seeing more fantastic interviews with some of the communities great train folks. Good luck and thanks (...) (17 years ago, 15-Nov-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | For a friend...
|
|
I made this for a friend... (URL) Red Sphere by Bubbaben>> Eric Sophie (17 years ago, 17-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) Lulu. com is pretty nice. The paper stock is a thicker matte stock than magazine stock, and the cover is a cover (thicker) stock. The print quality is very nice, much better than inkjet. Joe (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) I received my copy from lulu.com last week. The printing is definitely on par with magazine quality. And well worth the price to hold a copy on your hands. Jeramy and the rest of the staff did an awsome job putting RailBricks together. Cale (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) I thought quality was very good for the BrickJournal issues I got printed. Tommy Armstrong (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) Has anybody tried this yet? What's the quality like? What kind of paper? Is it like a magazine, or more like what I'd get printing it at home on an inkjet? (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) (other links ommited...) (...) WOW! My deepest thanks to the contributors and authors for sharing your ideas and instructions! And to Jeremy and the Think Tank for the idea of the PDF distribution, their perserverance, and sheer publishing (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
