 | | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) We could use this format, but it's a little bit harder for computers to parse. Not a big deal, especially for perl (of course :), but maybe we want to go with a more machine-friendly format? 2004-08-30T12:00:00Z This would be the equivilent of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal —Huw Millington
|
| | | | "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20040901134145....ron.com... (...) It would indeed, although the task of determining the co-ordinates falls upon the publisher, and it is not that easy a task for the novice. There are (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) That's one of my concerns as well. It is a nifty idea, but it's pretty far outside the original scope of the project. Parsing latitude/longitude (and distances between two points) implies a level of complexity well above a simple XML text (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Looks like about Aurora OR to me. (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
