|
|
 | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
| (...) AFAIK, yes - most CMSs, and almost all aggregators do support atom. (...) I don't think there's much of a difference between emitting Atom or RSS/LENNI, but I don't have that strong a preference. If everyone else is dead against Atom, I'll go (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
| (...) Exxxxxccccccelent (in best Monty Burns voice) (...) That's exactly right - leverage the tools out there, build on them, but don't require them. If, say, there are 100 LEGO-related RSS feeds available, and 25 of them are LENNI-enhanced, (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
| (...) I've just looked over some of the Atom docs, but it seems very similar to RSS to me, only much newer. Is Atom supported by many current blog or web publishing software? My thoughts were that straight RSS feeds would work within the LENNI (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
| (...) I've become convinced that Atom might be a better solution. If only because it has better mechanisms to ensure that entries are identified uniquely, and support for meta information about authors, etc. (...) If we're using RSS, using a custom (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
| (...) Sounds like a great project Kelly! I'm on board to help out! Bill, I think that the idea is that the base of this extended RSS format would be RSS "standard friendly", and that the extensions would simply be ignored by RSS readers/aggregators. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
