| |
In lugnet.general, Constantine Hannaher wrote:
> What is the case about how many visitors (who aren't bots or otherwise
> masquerading) are using Netscape 1-4 that makes a statement of corporate
> purpose to support a 1998 browser at the expense of later developments
> necessary?
I had trouble parsing this sentence. Would you consider restating it, perhaps as
several sentences with less convoluted sentence structure? Clearly, it's a point
you'd like to make, but I am not yet getting what point it is.
Thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf Viewer
|
| (...) Are humans visiting Brickshelf and displaying the site in Netscape 1-4? Does this level of usage of Netscape 1-4 in displaying Brickshelf make the support of Netscape 1-4 in designing the viewer experience of Brickshelf necessary? Does (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf Viewer
|
| (...) I think the comment "does not work in Netscape 4.x (and probably other legacy browsers)" is funny and sad at the same time. Frankly, that Brickshelf currently works in Netscape 4 (and be honest, it works in Netscape 3, 2, and 1, as well, where (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
