| |
> What I'd rather see is Kevin to implement at least a few of these • features, if
> not even more right on Brickshelf itself. Which is the whole point of BSV, • to
> show Kevin just how much better Brickshelf *could* be.
Brickshelf is a fantastic resource, particularly being free. And being a
user of a free resource it seems wrong to criticise it.
However, the Brickshelf interface is now looking somewhat dated and I am
sure there is a lot that could be done to improve its look and feel. The
folder creation form in particular is dreadfully unforgiving if you enter
invalid data.
I don't necessarily agree with what Bram has done, especially now Brickshelf
is looking for funding via ads, but I believe it will acheve what he
probably set out to do and that is to show, as you say, how much better
Brickshelf could be with a little more development, and it looks like it is
prompting discussion here which Kevin is responding positively to.
As I often say here, competition between websites is a good thing for
everyone, which encourages innovation and improvement.
Huw
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf Viewer
|
| (...) I really hate this line of reasoning. It assumes the user should not have any role in the development or maintainence of community software. While BrickShelf is privately owner, and provided as a free service, the users should be able to (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf Viewer
|
| (...) What I'd rather see is Kevin to implement at least a few of these features, if not even more right on Brickshelf itself. Which is the whole point of BSV, to show Kevin just how much better Brickshelf *could* be. --SteveR (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
