|
|
 | | Re: Deep links (was Re: Phil and Dixie [ (c) Phil Foglio ] Mosaic
|
| (...) Hmm, a cool feature for BrickShelf which shouldn't be hard. Have a button visible to the owner of a folder which brings you to a page which just provides clickable deep links for that folder, like: <A HREF="(2 URLs)<BR> You could also view the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Deep links (was Re: Phil and Dixie [ (c) Phil Foglio ] Mosaic
|
| (...) as the folder reference does, and will until the folder is moderated. In general you (as the originator of the image) need to click on links of this form and post the result of THAT. You can tell a deep link because it has the actual file name (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.build, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: Is Brickshelf slow for anyone else lately?
|
| I agree, it is slower. I think it would probably be a big help if Kevin would limit the sizes of images uploaded. Perhaps they could just be automatically resized to no bigger than 640x480, the way the thumbnails are generated. (If the larger image (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Picture size
|
| (...) Anything in excess of 640x480 is too big for most users. Screen size is not the only issue - consider also bandwidth. The file size grows exponentially as an image grows. (Twice the width = 4 times the size, 3x width = 9x size, etc.) (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Picture size
|
| (...) Agree, agree, agree, and agree. Just thought I'd put in that the only other concievable reason I could think of for pictures in excess of 800x600 would be for printing/photoediting purposes. But since that only occurrs once in a blue moon (IE (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
