Subject:
|
Re: Update to Toradoch Site + Link
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:34:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1248 times
|
| |
|
|
Beautiful. Just what I needed...many thanks Jeremy!
Cheers,
-G
In lugnet.publish, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Gil Shaw writes:
> > Thanks for the note on the button size Jeremy...any idea what the cm
> > dimensions would be? My antiquated vector software doesn't deal in pixels,
> > points or any other non-imperial/metric scale.
>
> Goink. Dunno. I guess it would depend on your DPI (or is it DPC?); I've
> always dealt with pixels. (Pixels, ugh. When will those computer graphics
> geeks get with the metric system?! First inches, now pixels, jeez... ;-)
>
> According to my handy-dandy ancient version of Photoshop, a rectangle of
> 88x31 pixels would be 3.1 x 1.09 cm, with a DPI of 72 (i.e. 28.346 pixels/cm).
>
> HTH
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Update to Toradoch Site + Link
|
| (...) Goink. Dunno. I guess it would depend on your DPI (or is it DPC?); I've always dealt with pixels. (Pixels, ugh. When will those computer graphics geeks get with the metric system?! First inches, now pixels, jeez... ;-) According to my (...) (22 years ago, 22-Aug-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
