Subject:
|
Re: Update to Toradoch Site + Link
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:28:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1430 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Gil Shaw writes:
> Thanks for the note on the button size Jeremy...any idea what the cm
> dimensions would be? My antiquated vector software doesn't deal in pixels,
> points or any other non-imperial/metric scale.
Goink. Dunno. I guess it would depend on your DPI (or is it DPC?); I've
always dealt with pixels. (Pixels, ugh. When will those computer graphics
geeks get with the metric system?! First inches, now pixels, jeez... ;-)
According to my handy-dandy ancient version of Photoshop, a rectangle of
88x31 pixels would be 3.1 x 1.09 cm, with a DPI of 72 (i.e. 28.346 pixels/cm).
HTH
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Update to Toradoch Site + Link
|
| Theft, flattery....it's really all the same ;> Thanks for the note on the button size Jeremy...any idea what the cm dimensions would be? My antiquated vector software doesn't deal in pixels, points or any other non-imperial/metric scale. As for the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Aug-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
