 | | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
|
(...) and (...) I'm glad at least you are noticing an improvement! And, thanks for your reviews, keep then coming. (...) forum (...) I had a play with an ASP.NET chatroom,, but it really didn't work too well. Personally, I don't think there is a (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
|
(...) Well, it certainly doesn't from here. Perhaps (hopefully) it was a transient thing. (...) ASP.NET is a vast improvement over ASP. I know I will be wasting my breath arguing its virtues compared to JSP/PHP etc. because I suspect you (and (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic
|
|
(...) You need to pay attention to the bandwidth allowance. Webspace is nice, but it's not as important as the traffic capacity, especially if your webhost will temporarily shut your site down or require extra fees if you exceed your allowance. If (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
|
(...) Seems nice and fast, even on my crummy work connection. And speaking as an ASP programmer currently having to write in PHP, ASP is so much better. :) It is especially speedy if run using Chillisoft on Unix James (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
|
(...) It takes a couple of minutes just to view the home page, even with the rewrite. Why are you using ASP at all? Why not use Perl, PHP, JSP, or just about *anything* but ASP? --Bill. (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickset.com receives overhaul
|
|
(...) Huw! That's great! I post reviews on brickset.com at least once a week, and I happy to see that response times have speeded up to a decent rate. Just a question here. What sort of additional features might you add to brickshel.com in the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: new ezboard
|
|
(...) When you post via NNTP you get a confirmation e-mail. To authorize the post, just reply to that e-mail and insert an "x" between the first [ ] brackets. You don't even have to delete the space after you insert the "x". It only takes a few (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: new ezboard
|
|
(...) Is there a way for instant posting via nntp? I know I'd seen a bit about possibly using PGP, but I don't know if that was implemented or just a suggestion. If such existed (or might exist soon), it would increase my priority on donating, since (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: new ezboard
|
|
(...) does it really have a better UI? I always found that kind of threading board terribly hard to read and follow. To the point that I can't actually use them at all, even for boards that I am interested in the content. It's just too hard to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: new ezboard
|
|
(...) Lugnet is free for reading and posting and always has been. Posting here is instant for me because I'm a member ($10 for a lifetime membership) and I stay logged in. When I'm not logged in, or for non-members, the verification email takes very (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
