 | | Re: new ezboard —Ben Roller
|
| | | (...) This seems rather silly to me. It's a duplication of Lugnet's format without all of the niceness. What features did you find in ezboard that you didn't find\like here? Ben Roller (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: new ezboard —Brad Benedict
|
| | | | (...) well for one posting is instant and its free (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new ezboard —Ben Roller
|
| | | | (...) Lugnet is free for reading and posting and always has been. Posting here is instant for me because I'm a member ($10 for a lifetime membership) and I stay logged in. When I'm not logged in, or for non-members, the verification email takes very (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new ezboard —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) does it really have a better UI? I always found that kind of threading board terribly hard to read and follow. To the point that I can't actually use them at all, even for boards that I am interested in the content. It's just too hard to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new ezboard —Alan Shutko
|
| | | | (...) Is there a way for instant posting via nntp? I know I'd seen a bit about possibly using PGP, but I don't know if that was implemented or just a suggestion. If such existed (or might exist soon), it would increase my priority on donating, since (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new ezboard —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) When you post via NNTP you get a confirmation e-mail. To authorize the post, just reply to that e-mail and insert an "x" between the first [ ] brackets. You don't even have to delete the space after you insert the "x". It only takes a few (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
