|
Another alternative is storing the MPEGs elsewhere and linking to them from
your site.
This would spread the load across several sites.
Just a thought
--
Jason King
LugNet #665
Steven Lane <Steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message
news:GJnzMM.DHC@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.technic, Thomas (T. J.) Avery writes:
>
> > Well congratulations! As Jennifer Clark once told me, "Ah, the price of fame".
>
> Yes that sounds like a Jenniferism :-)
>
> > I've had many problems with this issue too. Back in August, I had to move my
> > site to a real web host that wouldn't shut my site down when the bandwidth
> > capacity was exceeded. After getting CLSOTW, I had one day with 1.3 GB of
> > traffic! It's calmed down quite a bit since then, and I think my daily
> > average is around 40 MB.
>
> Yeah, next month might see far fewer hits, and I'm sure it's the mpegs that
> are breaking the limit so they'll have to go rather than have dodgy access
> to the site. Perhaps I'll start an adopt an Mpeg scheme for my future
> creations :-), that would spread the load.
>
> > Good luck with your site. If you need any suggestions on good webhosts, just
> > ask in the lugnet.publish group. Also, do a search for webhost because this
> > has been discussed before.
>
> I don't think I should pay to let people see my stuff. I'm doing Yahoo a
> favour by providing so many viewers for their advertising.
>
> > p.s. I wonder if Dennis Bosman is having the same problems too? He has a lot
> > of pics and I'm sure his site receives a ton of traffic.
>
> I wonder.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cool
|
| (...) Yes that sounds like a Jenniferism :-) (...) Yeah, next month might see far fewer hits, and I'm sure it's the mpegs that are breaking the limit so they'll have to go rather than have dodgy access to the site. Perhaps I'll start an adopt an (...) (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.publish)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|