 | | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
Steve, you've got to be kidding. It's cool ! It belongs there, right along with the rest of them : ) "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:v1fstsgb1pubrc6...4ax.com... (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Keppler Industries Update!
|
|
I am FINALLY done with completly re-doing my site! It has been in the works ever since the beginning of summer... So now here it is: (URL) entire site has been re-done, but most of your bookmarks will point you towards the new pages, but if you had (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
If you give links on a per-ship basis, they should probably be alphabetized according to the name of the ship. -- Paul Davidson Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:G211ut.5E3@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) LOL. (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
(...) What about some kind of a voting thing? People who visit the site could vote for the one they like best. Personally I don't really mind where mine is at, it's all good. :) -Matthew -(URL) The Star Wars instructions on my website are (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
(...) Well this actually brings up a whole other issue. Order. I originally had the order alphabatized by the ship names. But that put my ship at the top and I didn't want people to think I was tooting my own horn. Now the lists are alpha' by the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
(...) I don't care much, except I'd rather that my entry was *not* at the top of the ship-list. It's not exactly a flagship for the fleet, y'know? It would be better if the first entry was a really good one. Steve (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
"Paul Davidson" <tinman@direct.ca> wrote in message news:G1zyHx.H8D@lugnet.com... (...) (like (...) seeing (...) I personally don't mind the ldraw models mixed in. What does everyone else think? Jon (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Blacktron hand weapons
|
|
This? (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New mime type for .tdl files
|
|
(...) Thanks! James (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Blacktron hand weapons
|
|
A couple of months ago I came across a website that had some Blacktron I nanofig models and some Blacktron minifig hand weapons I thought were really cool. Does anyone know what site that is? Regards, --Ryan (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
I'd suggest dividing the pages into "real" and "LDraw". Some builders (like me) only like looking at actual models, while others definitely enjoy seeing what can be imagined up with LDraw. -- Paul Davidson Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
(For some odd reason my computer thought it was August. I'm mailing this again just in case the first post got lost in peoples newsreaders. Maybe I'm just paranoid. Oh well--apologies to those seeing this twice. Thanks to everyone for their input on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Introducing The Galactic Ship Yard
|
|
Thanks to everyone for their input on this. Of course this thing is going to evolve as it grows. Input is always welcome. (URL) If you have a creation you think should be on the list please check out the guidelines here: (URL) now the list needs (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I've never heard an official public statement from anyone at TLC acknowledging the site's existence, and I guess I would be surprised to see one. However, I can say that I do know of three attorneys at LEGO who know about the site and what it (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Aya, found it... Here's what I was thinking of: (URL) and I don't know how to interpret this code, and I don't know if it even applies in any kind of LEGO way, but there ya have it. --Todd [followups to .publish] (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I believe that they're aware of it, but have they *stated* that they're aware of it? That is, how could such "awareness" be documented at this point? Frank mentioned that some LEGO CSR's have referred to the site, but is that the same as TLC (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) They've been well aware of it for at least 26 months. I don't think they would suddenly ask that it be shut down, unless they began offering something equivalent themselves. --Todd [followups to .publish] (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Yes. Not doing so is stealing. (...) Nope. All that does is identify who the copyright owner is. These days, such a notice is not required to assert copyright ownership. (...) Well, I think people may have tried to ask. They are being put on (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
Do you need permission to put those things online? I thoguht that writing "Copyright ####### 19nn" was enough, but I'm not an expert. AFAIK, all the scans of lego sets/catalogues have been published without asking TLC first, right? Funny comic, BTW! (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1s6F1.H9n@lugnet.com... (...) comics (...) dialogue (...) I think that is the dialogue as published. Here it is in color: (URL) sets and parts for sale or trade: (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
