 | | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
I'd suggest dividing the pages into "real" and "LDraw". Some builders (like me) only like looking at actual models, while others definitely enjoy seeing what can be imagined up with LDraw. -- Paul Davidson Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2)
|
|
(For some odd reason my computer thought it was August. I'm mailing this again just in case the first post got lost in peoples newsreaders. Maybe I'm just paranoid. Oh well--apologies to those seeing this twice. Thanks to everyone for their input on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Introducing The Galactic Ship Yard
|
|
Thanks to everyone for their input on this. Of course this thing is going to evolve as it grows. Input is always welcome. (URL) If you have a creation you think should be on the list please check out the guidelines here: (URL) now the list needs (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I've never heard an official public statement from anyone at TLC acknowledging the site's existence, and I guess I would be surprised to see one. However, I can say that I do know of three attorneys at LEGO who know about the site and what it (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Aya, found it... Here's what I was thinking of: (URL) and I don't know how to interpret this code, and I don't know if it even applies in any kind of LEGO way, but there ya have it. --Todd [followups to .publish] (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I believe that they're aware of it, but have they *stated* that they're aware of it? That is, how could such "awareness" be documented at this point? Frank mentioned that some LEGO CSR's have referred to the site, but is that the same as TLC (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) They've been well aware of it for at least 26 months. I don't think they would suddenly ask that it be shut down, unless they began offering something equivalent themselves. --Todd [followups to .publish] (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Yes. Not doing so is stealing. (...) Nope. All that does is identify who the copyright owner is. These days, such a notice is not required to assert copyright ownership. (...) Well, I think people may have tried to ask. They are being put on (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
Do you need permission to put those things online? I thoguht that writing "Copyright ####### 19nn" was enough, but I'm not an expert. AFAIK, all the scans of lego sets/catalogues have been published without asking TLC first, right? Funny comic, BTW! (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1s6F1.H9n@lugnet.com... (...) comics (...) dialogue (...) I think that is the dialogue as published. Here it is in color: (URL) sets and parts for sale or trade: (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) I dunno, do what you think is the right thing. (IANAL.) (...) KFS = King Features Syndicate DFC = Dysfunctional Family Circus (...) WOW! Excellent! :) --Todd (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) Umm actually I don't have permission at all; I merely took a picture of it and posted it on brickshelf. Please tell me what action to take - whether I should get rid of it immediately, include some sort of disclaimer, or whatever! I don't want (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Look what I found in the comics section!
|
|
(...) LOL! And the second one got eaten because his house was juniorized? :-) BTW, how did you get permission from KFS to republish that online? (IIRC, KFS was recently cracking down on the DFC again.) Did you write the dialogue in yourself or was (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | FLL Team/Robotics Class information
|
|
I finally got around to posting some of the lesson plans, homework, etc. for FLL Team #1096 (The Unibots) to lugnet. Eventually this will all move to the school's web site, but until I get access to my little corner of the school web site, I am (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.edu, lugnet.edu, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Challenge: Fun with pictures!
|
|
Here is a fun challenge - make the most out of this picture using your computer. (URL) catch - the dragon has to be blowing fire, acid, or whatever you see fit at the soldier. It has to be a direct hit as well. I'm going to go back and try to redo (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Neo Plastics
|
|
(...) Oh, yeah, me too on the me too. Like the models, hate the html. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net (was Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) Sure, and then when someone clicks "next" or "previous" for that Ring ID, the Yahoo! server sees that the corresponding JS code for that Ring ID and Site ID hasn't been fetched recently by that IP address, and it gacks (by design) and it sends (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net (was Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
Right, but once Yahoo has spit out that content, you save it, and modify it any way you want to. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Transclusion via JavaScript (was: Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net)
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1Cpxr.Cqt@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) they (...) [script snipped] (...) had (...) JS (...) I'd (...) of (...) nasties. This is exactly what I do to generate my pages. My provider doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
