|  |  | Re: Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2) 
 | 
 | 
| I'd suggest dividing the pages into "real" and "LDraw". Some builders (like me) only like looking at actual models, while others definitely enjoy seeing what can be imagined up with LDraw. -- Paul Davidson Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in (...)   (25 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Introducing the Galactic Shipyards (take 2) 
 | 
 | 
| (For some odd reason my computer thought it was August. I'm mailing this again just in case the first post got lost in peoples newsreaders. Maybe I'm just paranoid. Oh well--apologies to those seeing this twice. Thanks to everyone for their input on (...)   (25 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.general) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Introducing The Galactic Ship Yard 
 | 
 | 
| Thanks to everyone for their input on this. Of course this thing is going to evolve as it grows. Input is always welcome. (URL) If you have a creation you think should be on the list please check out the guidelines here: (URL) now the list needs (...)   (25 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I've never heard an official public statement from anyone at TLC acknowledging the site's existence, and I guess I would be surprised to see one. However, I can say that I do know of three attorneys at LEGO who know about the site and what it (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Aya, found it... Here's what I was thinking of: (URL) and I don't know how to interpret this code, and I don't know if it even applies in any kind of LEGO way, but there ya have it. --Todd [followups to .publish]    (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I believe that they're aware of it, but have they *stated* that they're aware of it? That is, how could such "awareness" be documented at this point? Frank mentioned that some LEGO CSR's have referred to the site, but is that the same as TLC (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) They've been well aware of it for at least 26 months. I don't think they would suddenly ask that it be shut down, unless they began offering something equivalent themselves. --Todd [followups to .publish]    (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Yes. Not doing so is stealing. (...) Nope. All that does is identify who the copyright owner is. These days, such a notice is not required to assert copyright ownership. (...) Well, I think people may have tried to ask. They are being put on (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| Do you need permission to put those things online? I thoguht that writing "Copyright ####### 19nn" was enough, but I'm not an expert. AFAIK, all the scans of lego sets/catalogues have been published without asking TLC first, right? Funny comic, BTW! (...)   (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Look what I found in the comics section! 
 | 
 | 
| "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1s6F1.H9n@lugnet.com... (...) comics (...) dialogue (...) I think that is the dialogue as published. Here it is in color: (URL) sets and parts for sale or trade: (URL)   (25 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.publish) 
 |