 | | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8sdf01.lvi.....bu.edu... (...) years (...) separate (...) rights. (...) Unfortunately, I don't believe I do. (...) Yeah, not worth it. I noted that before so that I could acknowledge it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) Oops, looks like I misspoke(wrote). I just went back to the USPTO search page (URL) searched again with the "Registered" radio button selected (instead of "Both") and it didn't show up there, but showed up under "Pending." Thus, it appears (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) To the extent that that e-mail forms a contract (which is relatively weak), and that e-mail has no specific provisions for review or renewal, I suspect you could continue using "webring" for the site(s)/system(s) described in that e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) Do you still have that e-mail? That would be a good thing. "Web ring" is an extremely descriptive mark, and if you realllly wanted to go to court, you might be able to argue fair use. But I certainly don't think it's worth that! (25 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G13t90.194@lugnet.com... (...) servicemark (...) services (...) users (...) contain (...) word (...) This contradicts an email I got from a Webring representative a couple years ago, saying (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) According to the USPTO, Yahoo! (via GeoCities) has a registered servicemark on WEBRING, with pseudo marks WEB RING and WE BRING, in the goods and services category of "Computer software, namely a navigation tool that enables users of a global (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) BTW, if you replaced <form method=GET action=/cgi-bin/poll.cgi> with <form method=POST action=/cgi-bin/poll.cgi> then if someone hit the Reload button it would ask them if they wanted to repost the form. That might cut down a bit on accidents. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll
|
|
(...) Ya. I think I just hit the Reload button and it reposted the form. (...) At some point I turned off new cookies. It might have been after the entry page, or it might have had the old cookie from earlier. Hmm, weird. Something else I just (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) s/do you/did you/ Front page, search engine, "my" portal with stock price views and news. Oh, and I read their Reuters feed a lot. Yer typical "male aged 18-59" stuff. The ads were for Playboy and Maxim, FWIW. Porn by my definition. I have (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
|
(...) The latter. It certainly would be neat to have LUGNET do and be everything possibly (1) LEGO related. But I fear for dilution of focus and for Todd's sanity (2). However he's said that: a) he wants to do this b) he doesn't see it as a huge (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
