 | | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) Frank, I guess I should have worded the orginal question better, I didn't mean to say HTML only, but I think client side only would have been better worded. I realize that the current function isn't ASP. I should have been more clear, my bad. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) A small note about the scaling function you wrote; it isn't ASP, ASP is server side so if the user would press a button, the request has to do a trip to the server and back to make it's effect visible, the code you posted is typically client (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
(...) Your sample looks like javascript, not HTML-only at all. I'm not saying that to be bitchy -- just a suggestion that you might have better luck asking in javascript forums. (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | HTML for displaying an Image in a scrollable image box
|
|
I've posted this question in few HTML news groups, so I figured I'd post it here to, there seem to be some pretty smart coders here on LUGNET. I'm working on a HTML only project (its a demo of a site) and I need to show an image viewer that has zoom (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) You know, the 950 has a $100 rebate through the end of June. :) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: The Construction Site Boxcar...
|
|
(...) Eric, I've never been to that page so it can't be in my cache...and I have no problems seeing it with the following browsers: Communicator 4.73 (Mac8.6) Navigator 4.0 (Win98) MS Intermet Explorer 4.0 (Win98) Larry, I think the problem must be (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Yeah, I like the shot alot. I picked up my 2" mirrors at a Dollar Shop for 1$(can) each and 5$(can) for the 5"ers. Quick follow up note on the Macro issue; Take several Shots moving the Center Point for the AutoFocus each Time. I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Nice photo's btw. Mirrors huh? Never though of that. Not sure I have any that will work. Your pictures are crystal clear. Well here's where bleaching (too much light) came out pretty cool... The Lego Seal team in the helicopter bay coming home (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Urp, re-reading what I wrote above, it doesn't sound like praise for the camera. Actually, in the cases that I'm not 100% satisfied with its quality, I'm usually about 90% to 95% satisfied with it. Drooling over some of the Nikon pix I've (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital.
|
|
(...) Maybe that's my problem with low-light situations! (...) That's awesome! Wow. --Todd (25 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
