 | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I'll second that! For doing close-up LEGO photos, it might even be the most important feature you need. (...) I'll second that too! My camera[1] takes great close-up pictures with the macro, but only if there's *copious* amounts of natural (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Urp, re-reading what I wrote above, it doesn't sound like praise for the camera. Actually, in the cases that I'm not 100% satisfied with its quality, I'm usually about 90% to 95% satisfied with it. Drooling over some of the Nikon pix I've (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Marc Cook
|
| | | | | (...) Nice photo's btw. Mirrors huh? Never though of that. Not sure I have any that will work. Your pictures are crystal clear. Well here's where bleaching (too much light) came out pretty cool... The Lego Seal team in the helicopter bay coming home (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —David Goeb
|
| | | | | | (...) [snip] (...) Yeah, I like the shot alot. I picked up my 2" mirrors at a Dollar Shop for 1$(can) each and 5$(can) for the 5"ers. Quick follow up note on the Macro issue; Take several Shots moving the Center Point for the AutoFocus each Time. I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Photographing Lego's? Go digital. —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) You know, the 950 has a $100 rebate through the end of June. :) (24 years ago, 27-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
