Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:21:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
41 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tamyra Teed writes:
> [...]
> I'm behind Huw here, I don't see any reason why they should be pulled.
Maybe they shouldn't; I don't know. Suzanne's really the expert in this
area, not me. But I certainly trust her opinion 100%, given what I know
about what she knows.
At any rate, my original point anyway was that scans of a retailer catalog
make the online LEGO community look bad, and I'd also hate to see Huw get
into trouble with TLC, especially when he was just innocently trying to be
as helpful as possible.
> If that's the case, then the 2000 catalog on Brickshelf should be
> pulled. How far do we want to take this???
Kevin obtained the year-2000 catalog through legitimate means.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Well, I don't care how the pics from the retailer catalog were obtained. What I care about is that I missed it. I've been out doing Christmas shopping all day and now the pics are gone. I know the first thing I would have done had I seen the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| Ok, I haven't read the whole thread yet, though I've gone to the site, looked at the pictures, read a little more... looked a little more.. tell me just how is this any different than the pictures of the catalog we've already gotten a look at? the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
